Guitar News

David Michelet’s debut solo album gathers ten original guitar compositions, recorded at Studio Sainte-Reine for the Burgundy label Eaux Sombres.

Luis Ángel Topete Galván performs his classical-guitar arrangement of a traditional Norman song, paired with AI-assisted tapestry-style visuals.

Goran Krivokapić and Danijel Cerović continue their Bach transcription work with French Suites Nos. 1–3, recorded in Kotor for Red Poppy Records.

Giacomo Copiello’s video of Schubert’s Der Neugierige pairs a solo-guitar transcription with the original song’s score and words.

Homenaje, Piece de Guitare ecrite pour Le Tombeau de Claude Debussy by Manuel de Falla (1876-1946) – PDF sheet music for classical guitar with performance and lesson video. Comes with both a notation edition with left hand fingering and a separate tab edition. The level is early-advanced work (grade 9) depending on your technique, desired tempo, and level of refinement. The tempo is slow but there are a a few tricky sections contributing to the level.

My PDF Sheet Music Edition

• Homenaje by de Falla (PDF) from Werner Guitar Editions

Manuel de Falla (1876–1946) was a Spanish composer and one of the most important figures in Spanish classical music. His works combine elements of traditional Spanish folk music, Andalusian flamenco, and French Impressionism with a distinctive harmonic language. His Homenaje, Pièce de guitare écrite pour Le Tombeau de Claude Debussy (1920) was composed in memory of Claude Debussy, whom Falla greatly admired. Written for solo guitar, the work incorporates the rhythm of the habanera, expressive harmonies, and subtle references to Debussy’s music. The piece was premiered by guitarist Miguel Llobet in 1921, who also contributed to its early performance history. Although brief, it is one of the most significant works in the early twentieth-century classical guitar repertoire.

Here’s my YouTube performance and lesson link if you need it.

Samples

The post Homenaje, Le Tombeau de Claude Debussy by Manuel de Falla first appeared on This is Classical Guitar.

Classical guitarist and composer Kristen Waligora plans to release her solo-guitar suite The River Carried Us as a six-track EP and digital score on 22 October 2026, followed by a performance film.

Sam Desmet and Troy Gifford revisit Matteo Carcassi’s Op. 60 études for two guitars, pairing the original solo lines with newly composed second parts.

Classical guitarist Swede Larson’s After the Last Note connects monthly recitals with performance videos and reflections on the music behind each program.

The league leaders return home with a pronounced attacking advantage, but Getafe’s best chance is to keep the contest tight enough for pressure to build.

Prediction: Barcelona to win

Best available odds: 1.1

Available at: Betfair, Matchbook

Confidence: Medium

Barcelona enter this La Liga meeting in a commanding early position, carrying the stronger results and a level of attacking production that Getafe have yet to approach. The home win is the clear selection, with the expectation that sustained territorial control will eventually create enough openings to settle the contest.

The tension lies in how quickly that superiority becomes decisive. Getafe have shown that they can remain competitive in narrow matches, and every goalless passage would increase the importance of Barcelona making their dominance count. Selection uncertainty around one home player also tempers confidence without overturning the central case.

An early gap that should define the contest

Barcelona lead the partial table with 21 points from seven matches, while Getafe are 13th with eight. At this stage of the season, those positions cannot describe everything either side will become, but the scale of the opening gap is still relevant to this fixture. Barcelona have consistently converted their first seven assignments into points; Getafe have operated at a much more modest level.

That contrast places the responsibility on the home side to impose the game rather than wait for it to open naturally. Barcelona are expected to have more of the ball and produce the greater attacking volume, which should force Getafe to spend significant stretches protecting their position. If that pattern holds, the visitors’ task becomes less about matching Barcelona chance for chance and more about surviving repeated periods of pressure without allowing the match to accelerate away from them.

The limitation is that control does not guarantee an early breakthrough. Getafe do not need to outperform Barcelona across the whole contest if they can keep the decisive moments scarce. A compact scoreline deep into the match would shift some of the pressure back towards the leaders, making patience and execution more important than the broad disparity in the table. Even so, the starting picture clearly favours Barcelona having more routes to victory.

Chance creation gives Barça the strongest argument

The recent xG sample supplies the most persuasive support for Barcelona. Across the recorded matches, Barça averaged 4.50 expected goals for, compared with 1.60 against. Getafe’s corresponding figures were 0.75 created and 1.38 conceded. The samples are short and should not be treated as settled season-long identities, but the difference in attacking output is too substantial to ignore when assessing this particular matchup.

Barcelona’s 3.56 xG away performance against Sevilla is especially useful because it shows that the attacking weight was not confined to one extraordinary home display. The consequence for Getafe is straightforward: merely slowing the opening phase may not be enough if Barcelona continue generating chances over time. Repeated entries into dangerous areas would test whether the visitors can sustain resistance beyond the first wave and avoid conceding the kind of opportunity that changes the game’s structure.

This is also why the home selection does not depend on assuming complete defensive control. Barcelona’s average xG against in the sample was not negligible, so Getafe may still find moments to threaten. The pick rests more firmly on the expectation that the hosts can create enough to absorb that risk. Short-run xG can be influenced by individual match circumstances, particularly when one performance is unusually productive, but it still captures a recent attacking ceiling that Getafe’s own numbers have not matched.

Getafe’s resistance must keep the margins narrow

Getafe’s most credible route is visible in their two confirmed recent league results: a 1-0 home win over Málaga followed by a 1-0 away defeat to Betis. Both were decided by a single goal, showing how a restricted scoreboard can keep them within reach of a result even when their attacking output is limited. That pattern matters because it identifies the type of contest most capable of frustrating the home-win call.

Los Azulones would benefit from denying Barcelona an early lead and reducing the number of decisive moments. The longer the match stays level, the less opportunity Barcelona have to turn their superior volume into separation, and the more significance attaches to a single Getafe opening. Their threat does not require them to control possession or create continuously; it requires the game to remain compressed enough for one incident to carry disproportionate weight.

There is an obvious limit to that route. In the away defeat to Betis, Getafe produced only 0.33 xG while allowing 2.61, a balance that left little margin for recovery once they fell behind. If a similar chance deficit develops here, resilience alone may only delay the outcome. Getafe can threaten the selection by preserving a low-event game, but that approach becomes far less convincing if Barcelona score first and force the visitors to seek more attacking output.

One home selection question remains

Frenkie de Jong is the subject of a pre-match selection question for Barcelona. That introduces some uncertainty around the precise home lineup and prevents the broader statistical superiority from being treated as a guarantee that every preferred component will be in place.

Its influence on the verdict should remain proportionate. One unresolved selection question can affect how Barcelona approach the contest, but it does not erase the early points gap or the pronounced difference in recent chance creation. It lowers confidence around the margin of superiority more than it changes the direction of the call.

Barcelona are the selection to win at home, supported chiefly by their far greater recent chance creation and stronger early league position. The main risk is a compressed, low-scoring match in which Getafe remain level long enough to make one moment decisive. If Barcelona translate control into sustained opportunities, their attacking advantage should ultimately carry them through.

The post Barcelona’s attacking weight should prove too much for Getafe first appeared on The La Liga Argument.

The visitors have the broader statistical advantage, yet the setting at Mendizorrotza gives the hosts enough scope to keep the contest tight.

Prediction: No bet recommended

Confidence: Medium

Atlético Madrid travel to Alavés with the stronger overall case, but not a decisive one. The visitors should have more of the ball and apply the more sustained pressure, creating a game in which an away win is clearly plausible without looking inevitable. The recommended position is no bet on the full-time result.

The tension lies between Atlético’s broader attacking superiority and an Alavés side whose home profile is considerably more persuasive than its overall outlook. A narrow away win and a draw both fit the available evidence, while the main uncertainty is whether the visitors can turn territorial control into enough clear separation.

Atlético should control more of the contest

Atlético’s season numbers point towards a greater share of possession and the stronger attacking presence. They have produced more goals, shots and efforts on target overall, so the likeliest match shape has the visitors spending longer on the front foot. That should give them more opportunities to sustain pressure rather than relying on isolated moments.

The partial table reinforces that advantage without making it conclusive. Atlético are second with 16 points from seven matches, while Alavés sit sixth on 11 points after the same number of games. At this early stage, the positions offer a useful indication of how effectively each side has started, but they do not turn a competitive away fixture into a straightforward selection.

Control is therefore more likely to belong to Atlético than certainty. Having more of the ball and generating the larger volume of attempts can push Alavés deeper into the match, yet those measures do not guarantee the margin needed to remove the draw from consideration. The visitors have the tools to dictate the broad rhythm; the question is whether that authority becomes a decisive result.

Mendizorrotza changes the balance

Alavés’ home output is the strongest reason to leave the result market alone. Their scoring rate at home has been notably better than their away return, while their shot production has also risen on their own ground. That gives El Glorioso a credible route to answering Atlético’s pressure rather than merely trying to endure it.

The defensive split matters as well. Alavés have conceded at the same low home rate as Atlético, which makes a clear gap between the teams harder to assume. If the hosts preserve that level of resistance, Atlético may have to make their territorial advantage count through a relatively small number of decisive moments. That kind of game keeps both a narrow away success and a draw firmly in view.

These are still early home numbers rather than proof of a lasting pattern. They cannot erase Atlético’s wider attacking advantage, but they do make the visitors less attractive as a simple away pick. Alavés do not need to dominate to complicate the call: matching their stronger home scoring and shooting profile would be enough to prevent the contest from becoming one-sided.

Recent results make the away case tempting

Atlético’s two confirmed recent league results provide the clearest challenge to the no-bet position. They beat Real Madrid 2-1 and then defeated Osasuna 4-0, showing an ability to convert their stronger overall attacking output into victories. The second result in particular demonstrates the potential for pressure to become clear scoreboard separation.

Alavés come into the fixture with a less convincing pair of confirmed outcomes. A 0-0 draw away to Athletic B followed a 1-0 home defeat by Valencia, leaving them without a goal across those two matches. If that lack of scoring carries into this game, their favourable home profile will offer limited protection against a visiting side arriving from consecutive wins.

That contrast is significant, but the evidence remains a short run. Two results for each team can sharpen the away argument without establishing that the same pattern must continue at Mendizorrotza. Atlético become a stronger proposition if their recent finishing persists and Alavés again fail to score; unless both conditions hold, the draw remains too live to ignore.

Underlying numbers point the other way

The available three-match xG averages complicate the recent-results picture. Alavés have created slightly more while conceding markedly less than Atlético across that small sample, suggesting the hosts may be capable of keeping the game closer than the latest scorelines imply.

That signal supports caution rather than a firm home conclusion. Three observations are too few to outweigh Atlético’s broader superiority, and the recent underlying data require careful treatment. Their value is narrower: they provide another reason not to assume that the visitors’ recent winning margins will transfer cleanly to this fixture.

Atlético are the likelier winners, but Alavés’ home profile leaves insufficient separation for an away recommendation. No bet is the measured call. The principal risk is that Atlético’s recent scoring form overwhelms the hosts; if Alavés reproduce their stronger home resistance, however, the draw can remain in play deep into the contest.

The post Alavés can test Atlético Madrid without settling a difficult call first appeared on The La Liga Argument.

The early indicators point in different directions before an eighth-round meeting in which neither side has built a decisive statistical case.

Prediction: No bet recommended

Confidence: Low

Rayo Vallecano welcome Athletic Club to Vallecas for a match shaped by competing signals rather than a clear imbalance. Rayo have the more encouraging recent chance-creation figures, but Athletic bring a steadier defensive record and a sequence of results that makes them difficult to oppose with conviction. The appropriate call is no bet.

The tension lies between underlying performance and outcomes. Rayo may be capable of applying the greater attacking pressure, yet that alone does not settle a contest in which Athletic have shown greater resistance. With the early evidence drawn from limited samples and the broader records pulling in opposite directions, a narrow game or draw remains firmly plausible.

Defensive contrast keeps the contest tight

The clearest season-level contrast is in the goals conceded. Athletic have allowed 1.0 per match overall, compared with Rayo's 2.29. That gap gives the visitors a credible foundation even if they do not control the attacking exchanges. If the game is decided by which side handles periods without the ball more effectively, Athletic's record makes them difficult to dismiss.

Rayo's figure needs context for this particular fixture. Their poor defensive return away from home has been a significant drag on the overall season sample, while their home attacking split has been stronger. A match at Vallecas therefore need not reproduce the full weakness implied by the aggregate. The setting offers Rayo a better route to impose themselves, especially if their attacking output carries more weight than their season-wide defensive number.

Even so, the two parts of Rayo's profile cannot be separated entirely. Greater home threat may help them spend more of the match on the front foot, but it does not remove the possibility that Athletic remain competitive whenever that pressure fails to produce a lead. The early season totals describe a contrast rather than a certainty: Rayo possess the setting to improve on their broader record, while Athletic have the defensive base to prevent home pressure from becoming control of the result. That tension points towards fine margins rather than a dependable side.

Rayo's chance creation makes the home case credible

The underlying attacking sample provides the strongest argument for Rayo. Across three matches, they averaged 1.46 expected goals for and 1.74 against. Athletic's corresponding averages were 0.54 for and 2.01 against. On those numbers, the home side have created substantially more while also giving up slightly less, a combination that suggests Rayo may generate the better opportunities at Vallecas.

That difference matters because it offers more than a simple reading of recent scorelines. If the same balance carries into this fixture, Rayo should have the greater capacity to sustain attacking pressure and force Athletic to absorb it. A home win would become more plausible if that territorial and chance advantage is converted, while Athletic's low attacking figure would leave less room to recover from falling behind.

The limitation is the size of the sample. Three matches can identify a recent performance gap without establishing a lasting level, and the averages are vulnerable to a single unusual game. Expected goals also describe chance quality rather than the final outcome. Rayo's superiority in this measure is enough to block a confident away selection, but not enough to justify backing the hosts when the wider defensive and results-based evidence remains less favourable. It strengthens the home argument without resolving the match.

Athletic's results provide the counterweight

Athletic's route into the game rests on steadier confirmed results. They are unbeaten across three recent matches, and the latest listed league fixtures include a goalless draw with Alaves and a 1-1 draw with Elche. Those outcomes do not show a side pulling away from opponents, but they do show an ability to remain in contests even when the attacking numbers offer little encouragement.

That threatens the home case in a specific way. Rayo beat Espanyol 2-1 before drawing 1-1 with Osasuna, and their broader confirmed sequence contains one win, one draw and one defeat. They have therefore produced the more varied set of outcomes. If their stronger chance creation does not lead to an early advantage, Athletic's recent resilience could keep the match compressed and increase the importance of a single decisive moment. In that kind of contest, the draw remains a substantial danger to either side.

Athletic's sequence is not, by itself, a case for an away win. Two of the listed results were draws, so stability has not necessarily translated into separation on the scoreboard. Their recent attacking process also limits how far the unbeaten run can be taken as positive evidence. It does, however, make Rayo's statistical edge harder to trust as a basis for a selection. The visitors do not need to outperform the hosts across every measure; they only need their resistance to hold long enough for the home advantage in chance creation to lose some of its force.

Rayo's underlying figures create a modest home lean, but Athletic's defensive record and recent ability to avoid defeat leave too much resistance on the other side. No bet is the measured verdict. The principal risk to that restraint is Rayo turning their stronger chance creation at Vallecas into an early lead that Athletic's limited attacking output cannot answer.

The post Rayo Vallecano and Athletic Club offer too little separation at Vallecas first appeared on The La Liga Argument.

The visitors bring the stronger early profile to La Rosaleda, but their own recent defeats leave this round-eight contest more finely balanced than the table alone suggests.

Prediction: Espanyol to win

Best available odds: 2.82

Available at: Matchbook, 1xBet

Confidence: Medium

Málaga and Espanyol meet at La Rosaleda with neither side able to approach round eight from a position of comfort. The hosts have made the more difficult start, while the visitors have only a modest early advantage and arrive after setbacks of their own. That combination points to a competitive match rather than a straightforward exercise for either team.

Espanyol are the away-win selection. Their case rests on a better early-season position and a more encouraging recent balance between chances created and conceded. The principal uncertainty is whether they can turn that statistical advantage into control after successive league defeats. Málaga’s own problems make the visitors preferable, but the draw remains a substantial danger if Espanyol cannot make their stronger underlying profile count.

The chance figures lean towards Espanyol

The available recent expected-goals sample gives Espanyol the clearer platform for this contest. They have averaged 1.22 xG for and 1.39 against, compared with Málaga’s 0.52 for and 2.31 against. The difference is important at both ends: the visitors have recently generated more threat while allowing opponents less. If that pattern carries into La Rosaleda, Espanyol should spend more of the match in positions from which a decisive goal is plausible, without needing to overcome the same weight of opposition chances.

Málaga’s attacking number is the sharper concern for the home side. An average of barely half an expected goal suggests that their recent opportunities have offered limited scoring potential. That could narrow their route to victory, particularly if Espanyol again approach their recent attacking average. Even a moderate visiting performance may be enough to place pressure on Málaga to exceed what they have lately created. The figures do not guarantee that sequence, but they make an away win easier to support than a home one.

There are firm limits to the argument. The averages cover only three matches for each side, so they describe a short run rather than an established season-long pattern. One difficult match can also have a large effect on such a small sample, as Málaga’s 4.25 xG conceded against Villarreal demonstrates. Even so, the contrast is broad enough to shape the forecast: Espanyol’s recent balance has been less damaging, and Málaga may need a clear improvement in chance creation to reverse it.

The early table reinforces the away case

Espanyol’s advantage is also visible in the standings after seven matches. They are 15th with seven points, while Málaga sit 20th with three. Neither return is strong enough to suggest a wide gap in quality, yet the visitors have still collected more than twice as many points over the same opening span. In a fixture involving two teams in the lower part of the table, that modest separation matters because it gives Espanyol a little more evidence of having converted difficult matches into useful outcomes.

That does not make the visitors dominant. Seven points from seven games leaves them vulnerable to another tight contest, and their position offers no basis for assuming they can dictate the evening. The table supports a narrow preference rather than an emphatic call. Espanyol have done enough so far to stand above their hosts, but not enough to remove the possibility that the match remains level deep into its decisive stages.

The significance for this fixture is therefore comparative. Málaga must overturn both the current points gap and the less favourable underlying chance profile, whereas Espanyol need only reproduce the better side of their early work. That is a lower bar than asking the visitors to deliver a commanding display. An away victory could come from a small difference being sustained rather than a large one suddenly appearing. With both teams still early in the campaign, however, the standings remain a guide rather than a settled judgement.

Recent defeats keep the draw firmly in view

The strongest warning against the selection comes from Espanyol’s immediate league results. They lost 2-1 away to Rayo Vallecano and then 3-1 at home to Elche. Those defeats show that the visitors’ more favourable expected-goals balance has not recently translated into points. For all the promise in their chance data, they still conceded five goals across those two confirmed results and were unable to protect themselves from consecutive losses.

That sequence gives Málaga a credible route into the match. If Espanyol again fail to convert their underlying advantage into a lead, the hosts do not necessarily need to produce sustained superiority to remain competitive. A level game would increase the importance of isolated scoring moments and reduce the value of the visitors’ broader statistical edge. It would also bring the draw increasingly into play, especially if Espanyol carry no reward from their stronger periods.

The counterargument has its own limit because Málaga have not entered the fixture with positive results behind them either. They lost 3-1 at home to Villarreal before a 1-0 away defeat against Getafe. The hosts therefore have no recent win in this evidence to place against Espanyol’s vulnerability. Their best path is not supported by stronger form, but by the possibility that the visitors’ recent failure to turn chances into results continues. That is a meaningful risk, though not enough to reverse the selection.

Espanyol are the measured pick to win at La Rosaleda. Their higher early points return and superior recent expected-goals balance give them the better foundation, while Málaga need a notable attacking improvement. The call remains cautious: consecutive Espanyol defeats show why this may stay close, and another failure to convert promising positions would leave the draw as the principal threat.

The post Málaga’s early struggles give Espanyol the narrow advantage first appeared on The La Liga Argument.

Due on 23 October, Fujimoto’s first Naxos album includes Llobet’s Catalan songs and three recordings identified by the label as world premieres.

Rome’s 10–11 October guitar convention combines the Chitarre d’Oro awards with a Manuel de Falla programme, historical instruments and performances.

Brazilian classical guitarist Pedro Aguiar performs Sydolira by Mexican composer Gabriela Ortiz (b.1964). This comes via Aguiar’s YouTube (go subscribe). Amazing performance by Aguiar with a huge range of expressive articulations and colour over the complex textures of this work. An extraordinary performance, can’t wait to explore more of his work. This is only solo guitar work composed by Gabriela Ortiz who is a recent multiple Grammy Awards winner. Aguiar shared this quote via his Facebook page.

“I’m delighted to share this extraordinary performance of my piece Sydolira by guitarist Pedro Aguiar. I wrote this work many years ago as a tribute to my father, Rubén Ortiz. At the time, he was studying composition, playing classical guitar, and suffering from migraines. He therefore wrote a piece for solo guitar entitled Migrañas.

After my mother died at the age of just 46, my father stopped composing altogether. Years later, I found his manuscript and, when I had the opportunity to write a piece for guitar, I decided to draw upon one of the musical materials he had written.

The title Sydolira comes from a play on words between Sydolil, the medication my father took for his migraines and, as I remember, never left home without, and lira, referring to the instrument and to music.

In this way, Sydolira became a way of entering into a musical dialogue with my father and keeping his memory alive.” – Gabriela Ortiz

The post Pedro Aguiar Performs Sydolira by Gabriela Ortiz first appeared on This is Classical Guitar.

Question: How do I know what tempo a composer intends for their piece to be played?

Answer Summary: Tempos are often chosen based on the context of its presentation and through an awareness and analysis of various musical elements. The title, indications, texture and style, technique, music theory analysis, historical awareness, and research on the work or composer can offer many clues. There are also considerations of who is playing the work and whether the intended tempo is appropriate for the player to strive for. In the article below I cover the various elements involved in choosing a tempo.

Here’s the YouTube lesson link for the above video if needed.

The Title and Indications

There are many titles and indications that give you hints on a tempo range. The title itself can sometimes give clues, a lullaby usually will not be played so fast as to feel caffeinated! Whereas Flight of the Bumblebees implies some intensely fast busy work. A minuet in the Baroque era for example, was a graceful dance in triple meter so the tempo should be somewhat moderate and poised rather than fast. Maybe that puts the quarter note at 80–110 as a possible range but it also depends on the character of the piece and if there are movements around. Obviously tempo markings such as allegro indicate fast and largo slow.

An important distinction here is beat, pulse, and rhythms. Although a time signature might indicate a beat, the actual feel of the pulse can be the deciding factor. For example, in some music there might be three beats in a measure but we only really feel the the first beat. That first beat could be the tempo setter. Similarly, the beat or pulse can sometimes be very slow but the rhythms be busy and perceived as fast. A slow beat can feel quite different if there are continuous 32nd notes being played.

Texture and Style

The texture of the music may be a deciding factor for tempo allocation as well. A thick busy texture can only go so fast so there are limitations on speed. The style of the work is also important. Style can mean anything from historical awareness to set moods. A meditative piece likely has a style, as does an awareness of the impressionist composers. A fugue might demand voice independence as a top musical priority that overpowers tempo considerations.

Technique

There are always limitations to tempos based on the technique involved. A complex fugue by Bach may not be technically possible to play fast compared to a single running scale passage. Students often have to let their technique decide the limitations of a tempo so they can play well. An important thing to remember is that when tempo is reduced, other musical elements can be increased. So it’s not a bad thing to be limited by your technique, it may just require a different approach and reprioritizing of the musical elements in a performance.

Theory & Historical Awareness

There are many clues to tempos found in music theory and history from dance movements, to individual aesthetics of a composer, to era-specific awareness. Most students studying in a music school will take music theory and history lessons that include listening to and learning about music from all the musical eras. This brings with it a great awareness of style and tempo choices. School aside, listening to music can teach you a lot about tempos. For example, the Baroque Suite has a set of dance movements that were somewhat standardized and by listening to various recordings or Preludes, Allemandes, Courantes, Sarabandes, Bourrees, and Gigues, you start to form an awareness of choices you have.

Flexibility

Although tempos should be informed by the above factors, tempos are a flexible and interpretive choice as well. Different performers will have different goals with a work of music and that can result in a variety of different tempo choices. That is part of the joy of hearing different interpretations. Along with a different tempo choice comes a slightly different mood or emphasis on certain musical elements.

Recommendation

Listening to professional performances along with a score can give you a great education on tempo interpretation. Pick a piece of music (or the music you are playing) and find five different performances of it. Look at the title and indications, consider the musical era, get interested in the interpretive choices made by the performer. Over time you will build a an awareness of stylistically appropriate tempos for certain works and the vast variety of interpretations.

Another great thing to do is to experiment with tempos to discover the result. If you can play for other musicians and teachers they can give you feedback on the results.

The post How to choose a tempo for your music first appeared on This is Classical Guitar.

Luke Anderson & Lenny Ranallo perform Rêverie by Claude Debussy (1862-1918), arranged for two guitars by Peter Batchelar (originally for piano). This comes via Matthew McAllister’s Gallery of Guitar on Youtube (go subscribe). Beautiful lingering phrases and excellent ensemble cohesion from Anderson and Ranallo. Debussy’s Rêverie (L. 68) is an early piano work composed around 1890. Rêverie meaning daydream or lost in thoughts reflected the music with its gentle and contemplative character.

Looking for Duo Sheet Music?

• Ensemble Music (Duets, Quartets, More) – Dedicated Page for All Ensemble Music
• Satie: Enfantillages Pittoresques, Modern, Intermediate Duet 
• Munier: Romanza & Barcarola Op.262, Romantic Duet, Grade 4
• Dowland: My Lord Willoughby’s Welcome Home & My Lord Chamberlain, His Galliard, Renaissance lute duets for 2 guitars, late-intermediate-advanced
• Milano: Canone & Spagna, Renaissance lute duet for 2 guitars, intermediate

The post Anderson-Ranallo Perform Rêverie by Debussy first appeared on This is Classical Guitar.

The 15 November recital combines classical repertoire with Snowden’s own music, vocalisations and Celtic folk arrangements.

New classical guitar albums, editions, gear, compositions, and more for 2026. Submit your content but beware that only a few submissions a year will make the list. I get tons of submissions but due to time constraints it’s pretty much a lottery! Email: bradford@thisisclassicalguitar.com

Toward the Sea – Emi Ferguson (Flute) & Michael Poll (Guitar)
Toward the Sea by Toru Takemitsu, Histoire du tango by Astor Piazzolla, Altair by Elizabeth Ogonek.
Listen or learn more via Toward the Sea (Album)

Finnissy and the Guitar – Complete Works (1966–2022)
2026 First Hand Records | Buy & Listen at Presto | Read a Gramophone Review.

Anthology of Women Composers for the Classical Guitar, Vol. 1 by Eva Beneke and Heike Matthiesen (Editors). This anthology presents 20 pieces by women from the 16th century to today.
Find it at Schott Music Group.

Tiento by Brendan Evans – Tiento, the debut solo album of classical guitarist Brendan Evans. works by Milano, Maza, Nin-Culmell, Lauro, Ohana, and Bogdanovic. Green Flash Music.
Album Info: Brendan Evans, Listen on Spotify, Green Flash Music

Guitar America 250 by Aaron Larget-Caplan (Navona Records). Traditional songs from the Civil to World Wars, Classical works by Bernstein, Berlin, Price (violin-guitar), Hovhaness, Cage, and new works by David Liptak, Ian Wiese, and Paul Simon and Eddie Van Halen. Album info here.

The post 2026 New Releases for Classical Guitar first appeared on This is Classical Guitar.

The 2025 GFA competition winner’s autumn itinerary includes appearances across the United States and Canada.